Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - godoftrading

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8
16
Trading Strategies from the Street / Great Depression II Is Here
« on: August 11, 2009, 11:12:57 AM »
A Scary Reality

By BOB HERBERT
Published: August 10, 2009

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/11/opinion/11herbert.html?_r=2&hp

Last week was a pretty good one for President Obama. Bill Clinton helped out big time when he returned from North Korea with the American journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee. Sonia Sotomayor was elevated to the Supreme Court. And Friday’s unemployment report registered a tiny downward tick in the jobless rate.

But for American workers peering anxiously through their family portholes, the economic ship is still sinking. You can put whatever kind of gloss you want on last week’s jobs numbers, but the truth is that while they may have been a bit better than most economists were expecting, they were still bad, bad, bad.

Some 247,000 jobs were lost in July, a number that under ordinary circumstances would send a shudder through the country. It was the smallest monthly loss of jobs since last summer. And for that reason, it was seen as a hopeful sign. The official monthly unemployment rate ticked down from 9.5 percent to 9.4 percent.

But behind the official numbers is a scary story that illustrates the single biggest challenge facing the United States today. The American economy does not seem able to provide enough jobs — and nowhere near enough good jobs — to maintain the standard of living that most Americans have come to expect.

The country has lost a crippling 6.7 million jobs since the Great Recession began in December 2007. No one is predicting a recovery in the foreseeable future powerful enough to replace the millions of jobs that have vanished in this historic downturn.

Analysts at the Economic Policy Institute noted that the economy has fewer jobs now than it had in 2000, “even though the labor force has grown by around 12 million workers since then.”

Two issues that absolutely undermine any rosy assessment of last week’s employment report are the swelling ranks of the long-term unemployed and the crushing levels of joblessness among young Americans. More than five million workers — about a third of the unemployed — have been jobless for more than six months. That’s the highest number recorded since accurate records have been kept.

For those concerned with the economic viability of the American family going forward, the plight of young workers, especially young men, is particularly frightening. The percentage of young American men who are actually working is the lowest it has been in the 61 years of record-keeping, according to the Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University in Boston.

Only 65 of every 100 men aged 20 through 24 years old were working on any given day in the first six months of this year. In the age group 25 through 34 years old, traditionally a prime age range for getting married and starting a family, just 81 of 100 men were employed.

For male teenagers, the numbers were disastrous: only 28 of every 100 males were employed in the 16- through 19-year-old age group. For minority teenagers, forget about it. The numbers are beyond scary; they’re catastrophic.

This should be the biggest story in the United States. When joblessness reaches these kinds of extremes, it doesn’t just damage individual families; it corrodes entire communities, fosters a sense of hopelessness and leads to disorder.

The unemployment that has wrought such devastation in black communities for decades is now being experienced by a much wider swath of the population. We’ve been in deep denial about this. Way back in March 2007, when the official unemployment rate was a wildly deceptive 4.5 percent and the Bush crowd was crowing about the alleged strength of the economy, I wrote:

“People can howl all they want about how well the economy is doing. The simple truth is that millions of ordinary American workers are in an employment bind. Steady jobs with good benefits are going the way of Ozzie and Harriet. Young workers, especially, are hurting, which diminishes the prospects for the American family. And blacks, particularly black males, are in a deep danger zone.”

The official jobless rate is now more than twice as high — 9.4 percent — and even more wildly deceptive. It ticked down by 0.1 percent last month not because more people found jobs, but because 450,000 people withdrew from the labor market. They stopped looking, so they weren’t counted as unemployed.

A truer picture of the employment crisis emerges when you combine the number of people who are officially counted as jobless with those who are working part time because they can’t find full-time work and those in the so-called labor market reserve — people who are not actively looking for work (because they have become discouraged, for example) but would take a job if one became available.

The tally from those three categories is a mind-boggling 30 million Americans — 19 percent of the overall work force.

This is, by far, the nation’s biggest problem and should be its No. 1 priority.
_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

17
http://seekingalpha.com/article/153555-five-reasons-the-market-could-crash-this-fall

Few commentators care to mention that the total notional value of derivatives in the financial system is over $1.0 QUADRILLION (that’s 1,000 TRILLIONS).

US Commercial banks alone own an unbelievable $202 trillion in derivatives. The top five of them hold 96% of this.

Bear in mind, these are “notional” values of derivatives, not the amount of money “at risk” here. However, if even 1% of the $1 Quadrillion is actually at risk, you’re talking about $10 trillion in “at risk.”

What are the odds that Wall Street, when allowed to trade without any regulation, oversight, or audits, put a lot of money at risk? I mean… Wall Street’s track record regarding financial instruments that were ACTUALLY analyzed and rated by credit ratings agencies has so far been stellar.

After all, mortgage backed securities, credit default swaps, collateralized debt obligations… those vehicles all turned out great what with the ratings agencies, banks risk management systems, and various other oversight committees reviewing them.

I’m sure that derivatives which have absolutely NO oversight, no auditing, no regulation, will ALL be fine. There’s NO WAY that the very same financial institutions that used 30-to-1 leverage or more on regulated balance sheet investments would put $50+ trillion “at risk” (only 5% of the $1 quadrillion notional) when they were trading derivatives.

If Wall Street did put $50 trillion at risk… and 10% of that money goes bad (quite a low estimate given defaults on regulated securities) that means $5 trillion in losses: an amount equal to HALF of the total US stock market.

This of course assumes that Wall Street only put 5% of its notional value of derivatives at risk… and only 10% of the derivatives “at risk” go bad.

Do you think those assumptions are a bit… low?
_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

18
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local-beat/College-Grad-Cant-Find-Job-Wants--Back-52304162.html

She went to college to boost her chances of finding a great job once she got out of school, but now that that hasn't happened, Trina Thompson wants her money back.

Thompson, a graduate of Monroe College, is suing her school for the $70,000 she spent on tuition because she hasn't found solid employment since receiving her bachelor's degree in April, according to a published report.

The business-oriented school in the Bronx didn't do enough to help her find a job, Thompson alleges, so she wants a refund. The college says it does plenty for grads.

The 27-year-old information-technology student accuses the school's Office of Career Advancement for not living up to its end of the deal and offering her the leads and employment advice it promised, according to The New York Post.

"They have not tried hard enough to help me," the beleaguered Bronx resident wrote in her lawsuit, filed July 24 in Bronx Supreme Court.

Thompson's mother is proud of her daughter for completing her college education, but acknowledges Trina is upset that all her high hopes haven't panned out.

The mother and daughter live together, but Trina's mother, Carol, is a substitute teacher and the only one of the two who makes any money. They're barely scraping enough together to get by, reports the Post.

On top of her unemployment woes, Trina now faces mounting debt from student loans.

"This is not the way we want to live our life," her mom told the paper. "This is not what we planned."

Monroe defends its career-advice programs and is adamant that its staff assists young professionals in their careers.

"The lawsuit is completely without merit," school spokesman Gary Axelbank told the Post. "The college prides itself on the excellent career-development support that we provide to each of our students, and this case does not deserve further consideration."

On the school's Web site, the career program boasts that it provides free services for graduates at any point in their lives.
_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

19
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Shares of Morgan Stanley fell about 1.5% Wednesday after analysts at Goldman Sachs trimmed their rating on the stock to neutral from buy.

GS cautioned on MS trading and wealth-management businesses, but did say that several ongoing programs at Morgan Stanley are likely to create shareholder value.

Goldman lowered Morgan's price target to $32 a share from $34. Morgan Stanley was lately trading at $27.01.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/downgrade-clips-morgan-stanley-as-financials-fall-2009-07-29-10300
_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

20
TOKYO -- Toyota Motor Corp. posted its steepest domestic output drop for November in 30 years, with sales and exports tumbling to decade lows while local rivals cut production to counter dwindling auto demand world-wide.

Toyota said Wednesday that its domestic production dropped 27.2% in November from a year earlier to 288,138 vehicles -- the firm's sharpest November fall since 1978 from when its historical output data are available.

The announcement comes two days after Japan's largest car maker by volume forecast its first-ever operating loss in the current fiscal year through March, hurt by falling demand and the yen's strength, which is cutting into its profits more sharply than expected.

Some analysts warn that its earnings could get worse further down the road, indicating more output drops may come.

"We still cannot see an earnings bottom," Kota Yuzawa, analyst at Goldman Sachs, said.

Toyota's output in Japan declined as domestic sales skidded 27.6% and exports sagged 23.9% in that month. The sales fall is the biggest for November at least since 1966, and the export drop is the largest for the month since 1978 when exports sank 24.8%, a Toyota spokeswoman said.

For 2008, the automobile maker said Monday that its domestic production will fall 5% as sales at home and in overseas markets will drop, though it declined to provide an output outlook for 2009.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123011725097232599.html
_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

21
July 27 (Bloomberg) -- Hats off to officials in Seoul.

South Korea’s ability to expand at the fastest pace in almost six years is some of the best news Asia has had in a long while. It’s a sign that even with the $14 trillion U.S. economy in chaos, Asia is beating the odds and holding its own.

For now, at least. The region can’t be complacent for two reasons. One, increased spending and low interest rates are fine for the moment, yet they don’t replace a return of global demand. Two, loose policies may be doing more to fuel bubbles that merely provide the illusion of economic recovery, leaving Asia even more vulnerable to further problems in markets.

The 2.3 percent growth Korea generated in the second quarter dovetails with optimism that East Asia’s rebound from the global crisis may be “V-shaped,” not U-shaped or W-shaped. The Asian Development Bank said just that in a report last week. It recommended that central bankers retain expansionary monetary policies even as risks to recovery dissipate.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=awbeFpo0K1kw
_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

22
Trading Strategies from the Street / Who is Going to Buy U.S. Debt?
« on: July 24, 2009, 12:43:12 PM »
http://moneynews.newsmax.com/streettalk/federal_debt/2009/07/16/236312.html

In fiscal 2009, the U.S. government must find buyers for $2.041 trillion in new debt, three times as much debt as it issued last year.

Given the current state of the economy, it seems frighteningly apparent that a threefold increase in debt purchases by foreign buyers, mutual and pension funds and other usual investors is mathematically impossible.

“There is simply not enough money in the present economy to support a tripling bond issue in the normal course of business,” Sprott Asset Management head Eric Sprott wrote in a newsletter to clients. “As the lender of last resort, the only purchaser left is the Federal Reserve.”

In 2008, the Fed was a net seller of almost $300 billion of bonds, but in the first half of this fiscal year it’s buying almost $280 billion of bonds under a policy of “quantitative easing.” That means the Fed purchases assets, including Treasury and corporate bonds, using newly created money.

“The Federal Reserve’s ‘solution’ to the debt problem is the problem,” Sprott said. “It has resulted in the Federal Reserve doubling the monetary base of the United States over the span of a mere nine months.

“The future solvency of the United States as a nation state is currently in jeopardy. It is in far deeper trouble than the mainstream press cares to admit,” he said.

Maya MacGuineas, president of the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, said the White House and Congress should negotiate a broad plan to reduce deficits now.

"Most anybody who's being honest knows we've reached a point where we've got a very dangerous fiscal situation, and it won't fix itself," MacGuineas told The Wall Street Journal.

_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

23
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124804759792663783.html

U.S. banks have been charging off soured commercial mortgages at the fastest pace in nearly 20 years, according to an analysis by The Wall Street Journal. At that rate, losses on loans used to finance offices, shopping malls, hotels, apartments and other commercial property could reach about $30 billion by the end of 2009.

The losses by regional banks on their commercial real-estate loans will be among the most watched details as thousands of banks report second-quarter results over the next two weeks. Many of the most troubled banks have heavy exposure to commercial real estate. So far, 57 banks have failed this year.

The $30 billion estimate is based on financial reports filed by more than 8,000 banks for the first quarter. The trend continued as a handful of major banks reported second-quarter results, including Goldman Sachs Group Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. Regional banks tend to have higher exposure to commercial real estate than these big financial institutions.

The commercial real-estate market, valued at about $6.7 trillion, represents 13% of the U.S.'s gross domestic product. But the recession and scarce credit are pushing more commercial developers and investors into default. Meanwhile, property values continue to decline, and banks are required to record a loss on any troubled real-estate loans where the appraised value falls below the amount owed.

Delinquencies on commercial mortgages held by banks more than doubled to about 4.3% in the second quarter from a year earlier[/b], Foresight Analytics estimates. Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D., N.Y.), who heads the House's Joint Economic Committee, said she is working with Treasury Department officials on a plan to try to head off rising defaults on commercial mortgages before they cascade into a crisis.

In contrast to home loans, the majority of which were made by about 10 lenders, thousands of U.S. banks, especially regional and community banks, loaded up on commercial-property debt.

Ironically, small banks appear to be much less aggressive in recognizing losses than their bigger brethren. According to the Journal analysis, the largest banks, with assets of more than $100 billion, saw charge-offs roughly quadruple last year, while losses at many medium-size banks grew at a much smaller rate of 120%.

One monument to both the excessive froth of the real-estate boom and the morning-after headache setting in for lenders is the landmark Equitable Building, rising 33 stories above downtown Atlanta.

In 2007, San Diego real-estate firm Equastone LLC paid $57 million for the office tower and took out a $51.9 million mortgage from Capmark Bank, a Utah-based unit of Capmark Financial Group Inc. in Horsham, Pa. Equastone planned to expand the tower and attract a tenant with pockets deep enough to rename the building.

Shortly after the purchase, the economic slump pushed vacancies higher and rents down. In April, Capmark Bank foreclosed on the building after Equastone defaulted on the debt.

In June, the Equitable Building was sold in a foreclosure auction for $29.5 million, 43% less than the original loan amount. And the buyer? It was 100 Peachtree Street Atlanta, a company formed by Capmark Bank for the purpose of acquiring the building. There were no other bidders.

Steven Nielsen, Capmark Bank's chief executive, said the mortgage was written off to the "estimated value" of the building. He wouldn't specify the size of the related charge-off on Capmark's books. Property-tax records show the building was valued at about $44.8 million at foreclosure, which would equal a $7.1 million loss for the bank.

Some bankers say they feel growing pressures from regulators to take losses on commercial real-estate exposure as a way of reducing the possibility of a catastrophic hit later.

"We recognize losses as quickly as any bank, partly because bank regulators dictate that," said Ed Garding, chief credit officer at First Interstate Bank, of Billings, Mont. More than 40% of the bank's loans are in commercial real estate, but according to the Journal analysis, annualized charge-offs in 2009 would be just 3% of its nonperforming commercial mortgages as of the end of 2008. That compares with an average of 34% for all U.S. banks.

Mr. Garding said the commercial real-estate market has held up relatively well in First Interstate's markets in Montana and Wyoming. Meanwhile, "we're strongly collateralized so the loan doesn't result in a loss," he added.

Among other banks with notably low charge-offs: Based on the Journal study, annualized write-offs this year would be only 9% of all nonperforming commercial mortgages at a Wachovia Corp. unit in Charlotte, N.C. A spokeswoman at Wachovia declined to comment.

At New York Community Bank, a New York State-charted savings bank, that ratio would be a meager 2% in the first quarter. Ilene Angarola, director of investor relations at New York Community Bancorp., the bank holding company, credited the bank's strong underwriting standards. "Even though we have seen a decline in property values, our loan-to-value ratio is conservative enough that we haven't experienced anywhere near the degree of the charge-offs our peers have experienced," Ms. Angarola said.

Some analysts, meanwhile, worry that banks aren't sufficiently recognizing losses on their commercial real-estate loans, thereby exposing themselves to bigger losses later. According to Deutsche Bank AG, since the beginning of last year, the amount of charged-off commercial mortgages as a percentage of such debt outstanding has ranged from a high of 3.2% to as low as 0.3%.

"Net charge-offs to date have been highly inadequate," said Richard Parkus, head of commercial mortgage-backed securities research at Deutsche Bank. "This is clearly a problem that is being pushed out into the future."

How aggressively regulators respond could help determine how long the commercial-property market remains mired in turmoil. "If banks are allowed to bury problem loans away in their portfolios for years via massive term extensions, this is likely to be a very long process," Mr. Parkus said.

_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

24
July 22 (Bloomberg) -- Siemens AG plans to cut more than 1,400 jobs as the German maker of building controls, trains and turbines strives to meet profit targets for the year.

A unit manufacturing controls for office blocks and buildings is seeking to eliminate 300 posts at sites in Germany, the U.K., Switzerland and Sweden, according to company spokesman Marc Langendorf.

Chief Executive Officer Peter Loescher is digging deeper to beat last year’s 6.6 billion euros ($9.4 billion) in sector profit, or earnings from main businesses. Loescher’s aim to raise profitability to the level of competitors has coincided with a global recession that’s hurting orders. A year ago, Siemens announced 17,000 job cuts, and 19,000 workers are currently on reduced hours.

“Shorter work weeks are simply not enough,” said Heinz Steffen, an analyst at Fairesearch in Frankfurt. “After the elections in Germany we will see massive jobs cuts, both at Siemens and elsewhere. Companies will wait to announce these measures for political reasons.”

Under the latest round of cuts, an Austrian unit involved in software development could lose 630 positions. Siemens VAI Metal Technologies, also in Austria, stands to lose 200 jobs, with a further 300 posts earmarked for elimination at a British information technology services business, Langendorf said. Negotiations with workers’ councils at all four units involved are under way.

The German company faces missing margin targets at several units in the current fiscal year, said Theo Kitz, an analyst at Merck Finck & Co. in Munich.

“In some areas, Siemens might have to reduce costs further in order to reach them” next year, the analyst added.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ai52HYyOXzpE

____________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

25
Trading Strategies from the Street / Big Ben’s Dilemma
« on: July 21, 2009, 11:46:54 AM »
The Sovereign Society Offshore A-Letter
Monday, July 20, 2009

Financial “Hindsight” Set to Ruin Investors:
The Inconvenient Difference between
What the Fed Does and what the Media Says

Dear A-Letter Reader,

Hindsight’s a funny thing…

I mean now, today, it seems painfully obvious that the business of loaning money to people who can’t pay you back…well, that’s bound to fail. Today, it’s pretty obvious that auction-rate securities can be prone to the “stampede” effect. And it’s also pretty obvious that selling hundreds of trillions worth of Credit Default Swaps (bankruptcy bets) introduces serious systemic risk…

And yet, we did all these things for years.

Financial analysts toted the value of AAA-rated securities…Cramer & CNBC lauded bank stocks and REITs while the U.S. real estate market was clearly in bubble mode.

But then something funny happened…

When the bubbles came crashing down…when average investors like you and I pushed retirement back by another year…when the mom & pop pensioners went broke…it all became “clear as day” to the financial media.

In the heat of the moment, most commentators offered advice that was little better than a coin-flip (and often disastrously worse). But in hindsight, the pundits all really were the people their marketing promised to be.

They talked about the ‘bubble’ like scholars. As though it’d always been a fact of life…not a multi-trillion dollar booby trap that somehow suckered ‘em all in.

In the eyes of the uneducated observer – one that doesn’t remember Cramer’s Bear Stearns buy in early March of last year – this is where they get their credibility. They talk smart…they mention metrics and news that the professionals are keen on. And if you’ve got a short memory…well, they’ve got you hooked.

But what if this isn’t your first rodeo?

What if you know these guys are missing something…you just can’t put your finger on it. What if you don’t want their stupidity costing you in the long run? It’s only fair.

Well if that’s what you’re looking for, then you need to understand…
Big Ben’s Dilemma…

The realization first struck me when I read about Big Ben Bernanke’s photo-op today, and what’s expected of him…

To bring you up to speed; remember that Ben needs low interest rates. Why? Because the mortgage market is still garbage, and an impending wave of resets and recasts could send defaults through the roof and torpedo any chance of recovery. The higher the rates, the more intense the damage.

So Ben pulled every last rabbit out of the hat when it came to keeping rates low…even going to the extent of printing money to buy government debt (something like Weimar Germany did in the '20’s and Japan did in the '90’s).

But this puts Ben in a tight spot…

Think about it; he could open up the printing press and literally flood the world with dollars. This would cure any mortgage problems in the U.S., but it would also avail us of meaningful economic activity. In other words; this option is kind of fixing a broken leg by chopping it off.

But – if he’s mindful of inflation…and he keeps his printing to a minimum – then all his effort so far could become worthless. As an academic, he insists that this very reluctance to print money was what made the Great Depression of the 1930’s so brutally intense.

In the short-term, Bernanke’s actions saved us from wholesale failure of the U.S. financial sector last year.

But at what cost?
The Difference between Stabilization and Recovery

That very question is on the tip of everyone’s tongue here lately; how much is this going to cost us in the long run?

Ultimately, concern over the answer served to lengthen the Great Depression of the 1930’s. These days, it’s on the brink of forcing Bernanke to show his hand…namely; whether he’s playing toward stabilization…or he’s playing toward recovery.

To calm fears about what Bloomberg calls, “the biggest monetary expansion in history,” Ben is prepared to tighten the belt on his pool of funny money. One of the most prominent options for making that happen would be, “establishing term deposits at the Fed designed to induce banks to keep money there rather than lending it out.”

Wait a second. Hit the brakes…

Did he say that he was going to incentivize banks not to lend out money?

That’s curious.

I mean; hasn’t the general party line – the phrase spouted so often by Obama and his posse – that we need to “get lending going again,” that we need to “spur on lending…”

Then there’s my personal favorite… “Credit is the lifeblood of our economy.”

So let’s work this out practically; if credit is the lifeblood of our economy…and the forces of bankruptcy and default are slowly causing us to bleed out…then doesn’t recovery necessitate growth in credit?

You just got it. Right there…Ben’s not talking about recovery.

Obama and Bernanke aren’t saying the same thing. Bernanke and CNBC aren’t saying the same thing. Obama and CNBC are the only two out of the three that actually agree…

Bernanke – through his cautious actions and statements – is acting in the interest of stabilizing the U.S. financial system. Even after spending so many billions, bailing out so many slimy bankers…the man’s still got a full plate. He’s “monkey-in-the-middle” between the threat of inflation and a rapidly deteriorating U.S. housing market.

Obama and CNBC – on the other hand – apparently missed the memo…because they skipped ahead to “hindsight” on the stabilization bit.

After saving a handful of prominent campaign contributors like Goldman and AIG, both seemed to take the optimistic tack, sometimes declaring “the worst is over,” or even declaring an outright end to recession.

Why they would think to do this is beyond me and the page I have left for today’s A-Letter. Call it a matter of vested interest…an occasion of “say it ain’t so”…or a repeat of the early days of the Great Depression.

Some might even observe the fact that if you and I buy into this recovery – with what’s left of our portfolios – then it will be more likely to succeed; that there’s something vaguely conspiratorial about this whole arrangement. To that I shrug…and remind you of Clark’s law (Never assume malice where sufficiently advanced incompetence will do).

Instead, the most important thing for you to remember now is this; if you’re out there investing today, you’re investing amid active stabilization of the economy—and not during a recovery.

For a few words on what that means to you, I talked to our Chief of Research, Andrew Packer…
Stabilization & Your Portfolio

“Stabilization is the renunciation of a process known as ‘creative destruction’ – something seen today in the form of bankruptcies and defaults. On a deeper level though, creative destruction is what allows economies to succeed over time…

“Defaults may be bad…even punitive to the parties involved. But they’re the penalty in a free-market system for poor choices. Those who correctly recognized the risk and shorted were rewarded. It’s all part of the profit system as defined by a system of capitalism (as opposed to the profit system as defined by investment banks).

“At first, creative destruction might seem painful or even unfair. But in the long run it opens up an economy for innovation and new industries…contributing to greater efficiency and an economy better fit to serve a changing populace.

“The renunciation of creative destruction – often euphemized as ‘stabilization’ – tends to correspond to a shift toward state intervention…one which destroys capital, innovation, and freedom.

“It’s the process by which bad loans are kept on the books of banks that should be bankrupt. It’s the process that keeps things frozen, or moving at such a slow pace that true recovery is delayed—potentially for years.

“Ultimately, the only thing that’s being stabilized here is failure.

“For the sovereign investor, the implications are clear: stabilized markets make for poor investment returns. Since that can happen at any time, diversification and liquidity remain your best defense against this type of market performance. Markets that involve physical ownership, such as silver and gold, offer slightly more safety from stabilization than paper markets—including debt and equities.”

Yours in Personal Sovereignty,

Matthew Collins

_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

26
By Nassim Nicholas Taleb

1. What is fragile should break early while it is still small. Nothing should ever become too big to fail. Evolution in economic life helps those with the maximum amount of hidden risks – and hence the most fragile – become the biggest.

2. No socialisation of losses and privatisation of gains. Whatever may need to be bailed out should be nationalised; whatever does not need a bail-out should be free, small and risk-bearing. We have managed to combine the worst of capitalism and socialism. In France in the 1980s, the socialists took over the banks. In the US in the 2000s, the banks took over the government. This is surreal.

3. People who were driving a school bus blindfolded (and crashed it) should never be given a new bus. The economics establishment (universities, regulators, central bankers, government officials, various organisations staffed with economists) lost its legitimacy with the failure of the system. It is irresponsible and foolish to put our trust in the ability of such experts to get us out of this mess. Instead, find the smart people whose hands are clean.

4. Do not let someone making an “incentive” bonus manage a nuclear plant – or your financial risks. Odds are he would cut every corner on safety to show “profits” while claiming to be “conservative”. Bonuses do not accommodate the hidden risks of blow-ups. It is the asymmetry of the bonus system that got us here. No incentives without disincentives: capitalism is about rewards and punishments, not just rewards.

5. Counter-balance complexity with simplicity. Complexity from globalisation and highly networked economic life needs to be countered by simplicity in financial products. The complex economy is already a form of leverage: the leverage of efficiency. Such systems survive thanks to slack and redundancy; adding debt produces wild and dangerous gyrations and leaves no room for error. Capitalism cannot avoid fads and bubbles: equity bubbles (as in 2000) have proved to be mild; debt bubbles are vicious.

6. Do not give children sticks of dynamite, even if they come with a warning . Complex derivatives need to be banned because nobody understands them and few are rational enough to know it. Citizens must be protected from themselves, from bankers selling them “hedging” products, and from gullible regulators who listen to economic theorists.

7. Only Ponzi schemes should depend on confidence. Governments should never need to “restore confidence”. Cascading rumours are a product of complex systems. Governments cannot stop the rumours. Simply, we need to be in a position to shrug off rumours, be robust in the face of them.

8. Do not give an addict more drugs if he has withdrawal pains. Using leverage to cure the problems of too much leverage is not homeopathy, it is denial. The debt crisis is not a temporary problem, it is a structural one. We need rehab.

9. Citizens should not depend on financial assets or fallible “expert” advice for their retirement. Economic life should be definancialised. We should learn not to use markets as storehouses of value: they do not harbour the certainties that normal citizens require. Citizens should experience anxiety about their own businesses (which they control), not their investments (which they do not control).

10. Make an omelette with the broken eggs. Finally, this crisis cannot be fixed with makeshift repairs, no more than a boat with a rotten hull can be fixed with ad-hoc patches. We need to rebuild the hull with new (stronger) materials; we will have to remake the system before it does so itself. Let us move voluntarily into Capitalism 2.0 by helping what needs to be broken break on its own, converting debt into equity, marginalising the economics and business school establishments, shutting down the “Nobel” in economics, banning leveraged buyouts, putting bankers where they belong, clawing back the bonuses of those who got us here, and teaching people to navigate a world with fewer certainties.

Then we will see an economic life closer to our biological environment: smaller companies, richer ecology, no leverage. A world in which entrepreneurs, not bankers, take the risks and companies are born and die every day without making the news.

27
Trading Strategies from the Street / Verleger Sees $20 Oil This Year
« on: July 17, 2009, 11:14:28 AM »
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aQBXqFcd5gJo

July 16 (Bloomberg) -- Crude oil will collapse to $20 a barrel this year as the recession takes a deeper toll on fuel demand, according to academic and former U.S. government adviser Philip Verleger.

A crude surplus of 100 million barrels will accumulate by the end of the year, straining global storage capacity and sending prices to a seven-year low, said Verleger, who correctly predicted in 2007 that prices were set to exceed $100. Supply is outpacing demand by about 1 million barrels a day, he said.

“The economic situation is not getting better,” Verleger, 64, a professor at the University of Calgary and head of consultant PKVerleger LLC, said in a telephone interview yesterday. “Global refinery runs are going to be much lower in the fall. If the recession continues and it’s a warm winter, it’s going to be devastating.”

Crude oil last traded at $20 a barrel in February 2002. Futures were at $61.18 today in New York, having recovered 89 percent from a four-year low reached last December. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries is implementing record supply cuts announced last year in response to plunging consumption.

“OPEC don’t realize the magnitude of the cuts they need to make,” which would total about a further 2 million barrels a day, Verleger added. “Storage is going to become tight. It’s not clear if there’s going to be enough storage available.”

China, Inflation

Oil will average $63.91 in the fourth quarter, according to the median of analyst forecasts compiled by Bloomberg. Crude for December delivery traded at $65.61 today in New York. Prices have rebounded on expectations of a demand recovery, led by China and other developing economies, and concern expansionary monetary policy would stoke inflation and weaken the dollar.

At the other end of the spectrum from Verleger, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. predicted in a report yesterday oil will rally to $85 a barrel by the end of the year, and recommended that clients buy futures contracts for delivery in December 2011.

“China is in a real desperate situation,” said Verleger, who publishes the Petroleum Economics Monthly. “We’re in a situation where U.S. consumers aren’t consuming and Chinese manufacturers get hurt. Economists are looking for growth in all the wrong places.”

Forward contracts for oil have been higher than prices for immediate delivery this year, a situation known as contango, creating incentives to buy crude now and store it. That may end as growing stockpiles make storage more expensive.

“Prices would be much lower today, but for the very large incentive to build inventories,” Verleger said. “You need forward buyers, which we had when people were fearing inflation, but as concerns turn toward deflation” that will no longer be the case.

To contact the reporters on this story: Grant Smith in London at gsmith52@bloomberg.net
_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

28
By Kevin McCoy, USA TODAY

The closely watched Justice Department court fight to get the names of 52,000 suspected American tax evaders from Swiss banking giant UBS has prompted some other foreign banks to drop U.S. clients they once welcomed, tax experts said Monday.
Eager to avoid a similar struggle with federal prosecutors, banks including Credit Suisse and HSBC in recent weeks have notified American clients they must close their offshore accounts or transfer them to the institutions' U.S.-based operations, where tax reporting requirements are far stricter.

"Overall, the international banking community, and particularly the offshore banking community, has been very friendly to American account holders," said William Sharp, a tax law specialist at the Sharp Kemm law firm in Tampa. "That changed in the past couple of months as a result of the UBS case."

U.S. District Judge Alan Gold in Miami on Monday granted an adjournment until Aug. 3 to enable federal prosecutors and attorneys for UBS and the Swiss government to continue negotiations toward a potential settlement. The Justice Department on Sunday said any deal must include data "on a significant number of individuals with UBS accounts."

The owner of an HSBC account in Jersey, one of the English Channel islands, recently received a 45-day notice to close the account, said Robert McKenzie, a tax law specialist at Arnstein & Lehr in Chicago. A client with an offshore Credit Suisse account got a similar notice, he said.

Credit Suisse said, "We strongly believe that we adhere to the highest compliance standards, applicable laws, regulations and policies."

HSBC stressed it doesn't comment on specific client matters, and said the bank "abides by the letter and spirit of the law in every country in which it operates."

Other Swiss banks initially welcomed clients who shifted assets from UBS as the legal fight began last year. The eager greeting turned to reluctance as the trial date loomed, said Charles Rettig, a tax expert at Hochman Salkin Rettig Toscher & Perez in Beverly Hills.

Some foreign banks elsewhere now avoid offshore business with Americans because they know the Justice Department plans "to extend this effort to other jurisdictions beyond Switzerland," said Martin Press, a tax expert at Gunster Yoakley Valdes-Fauli & Stewart in Fort Lauderdale.

_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

29
WASHINGTON – Nine months into the fiscal year, the federal deficit has topped $1 trillion for the first time.

The imbalance is intensifying fears about higher interest rates and inflation, and already pressuring the value of the dollar. There's also concern about trying to reverse the deficit — by reducing government spending or raising taxes — in the midst of a harsh recession.

The Treasury Department said Monday that the deficit in June totaled $94.3 billion, pushing the total since the budget year started in October to nearly $1.1 trillion.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090713/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/us_economy_deficit
_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

30
July 9 (Bloomberg) -- China’s passenger-vehicle sales rose 48 percent in June, the biggest jump since February 2006, as government stimulus spending spurred a revival in the world’s third-largest economy.

Chinese motorists bought 872,900 cars, sport-utility vehicles and other passenger vehicles last month, the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers said in a statement today. Overall auto sales, including buses and trucks, rose 36 percent from a year earlier to 1.14 million.

A 4 trillion yuan ($585 billion) economic package has helped China surpass the U.S. as the world’s largest auto market this year and boosted sales for companies from General Motors Corp. to Alcoa Inc. The country is “a positive force” that will help drive growth as the world emerges from the global recession, billionaire George Soros said yesterday.

“China’s downward slide is clearly over,” said Wang Qingtao, an analyst at First Capital Securities Co. in Shenzhen. “There is also huge natural demand for vehicles, which will continue to drive the industry for years to come.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aitR1CpS3KT8
_________________
http://zantrio.com
http://millennium-traders.com
http://swing-trading.com

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8